Data Products and Data Sharing Maturity Assessment
A 41-question diagnostic across 7 domains that evaluates whether data is run as products people can find, trust and use, and whether it is shared inside and outside the organization safely and on clear terms: sharing str...
Overview
A 41-question diagnostic across 7 domains that evaluates whether data is run as products people can find, trust and use, and whether it is shared inside and outside the organization safely and on clear terms: sharing strategy, policy and approvals, data product management, data contracts, internal sharing and interoperability, external sharing, data ecosystems and data acquisition, privacy-preserving and controlled sharing, and value and improvement. Written for the chief data officer or head of data platforms who needs to answer: can people inside and outside the organization find, trust and use our data as products, shared safely and on clear terms?
Detailed Description
Most organizations share far more data than they can account for: extracts emailed to partners, copies built because nobody could find the original, feeds that break when a source changes, and purchased data used for purposes its license never allowed. This assessment tests whether data is managed as products with owners, service levels and contracts, published in the catalog and drawn from authoritative sources, and whether every sharing arrangement is approved by risk, recorded, governed by an agreement and usage rights, and ended with proof. It covers joining data spaces and marketplaces, the safer alternatives to raw sharing, such as aggregates, synthetic and de-identified data and controlled environments with output checking, and keeping the use limits of data bought or collected from outside. It gives particular weight to AI: data products fit for AI use, products exposed to AI agents only as registered tools limited to what the acting user may see, and the use limits on external data for AI. It is a deep dive in the ITSG data family. Strategy, policy, decision rights, ownership, risk, value, source approval and the sale of data come from Data Governance and Management; the catalog and glossary from Metadata, Catalog and Lineage; authoritative sources and quality from Master Data and Data Quality Management; channels and masking by level from Data Classification and Handling; processors, de-identification and notification from Privacy Program Operations; APIs, events, schemas and agent tool servers from API and Integration Lifecycle, which also owns API commercial plans and metering. The model is neutral to jurisdiction and vendor.
Assessment Details
Audience
Primary: chief data officer, head of data platforms and data product leads. Secondary: data product owners and domain teams, data platform and integration teams, legal, partnerships and procurement, privacy, security and risk, and the data governance office.
Purpose
Shows whether shared data is found, trusted and used, where products and sharing exist only as informal copies and emails, and which arrangements carry the most legal, security and AI risk. Gives the chief data officer a prioritized roadmap for data products and sharing, and a baseline for partners, auditors and regulators.
Effort
Initial assessment: 8 to 10 hours of facilitated sessions over two weeks with the data governance office, two or three data product owners, the data platform team, legal and partnerships, and privacy and security, starting with a 30-minute session with every area for the four all-area questions. Evidence gathering: the sharing policy and register, product standard and register, contract standard and samples of contracts, agreements, external data records, controlled environment procedure and the performance report. Reassessment: 4 to 5 hours.
Cadence
Annually, and after a new partner program, a data marketplace or data space membership, a major platform change, a large data purchase, a new AI program over shared data, or a sharing incident.
Framework Alignment
KPIs
- Products Meeting Adoption Targets - Share of data products meeting the adoption target set at intake. Target: at least 80%.
- Products with Contracts - Share of published products and dataset feeds outside managed APIs and event streams with an approved data contract. Target: 100%.
- Products Delivering Claimed Benefit - Share of data products launched more than a year ago whose realized benefit meets the benefit claimed at approval. Target: at least 75%.
- Service Levels Met - Share of product service level results meeting target in the period. Target: at least 95%.
- Raw Sharing Where Less Was Enough - Share of sampled approved requests that shared raw or identifiable data where a less revealing method would have met the purpose. Target: 5% or less.
Dependencies
Assessment Outline
(7 domains · 41 questions)-
1
1 Sharing Strategy and Policy
Sharing policy and principles, approval authority, sharing risk method, sharing register, roles and skills, strategy and roadmap
- 1.1 Data Sharing Policy 1 questions
- 1.2 Approval Authority 1 questions
- 1.3 Sharing Risk Assessment 1 questions
- 1.4 Sharing Register 1 questions
- 1.5 Roles and Skills 1 questions
- 1.6 Strategy and Roadmap 1 questions
-
2
2 Data Product Management
Product definition, demand intake, ownership, catalog publication, service levels, consumer onboarding and registration, retirement, AI-ready products
- 2.1 Data Product Definition 1 questions
- 2.2 Demand Intake and Prioritization 1 questions
- 2.3 Product Ownership 1 questions
- 2.4 Catalog Publication 1 questions
- 2.5 Product Service Levels 1 questions
- 2.6 Consumer Onboarding and Registration 1 questions
- 2.7 Deprecation and Retirement 1 questions
- 2.8 AI-Ready Data Products 1 questions
-
3
3 Data Contracts
Contract standard, coverage, versioning, breaking change control, enforcement rules
- 3.1 Data Contract Standard 1 questions
- 3.2 Contract Coverage 1 questions
- 3.3 Versioning and Compatibility 1 questions
- 3.4 Breaking Change Control 1 questions
- 3.5 Contract Enforcement Rules 1 questions
-
4
4 Internal Sharing and Interoperability
Authoritative sources, shared semantics, internal use approvals, channel selection, products exposed to AI agents as tools
- 4.1 Authoritative Sources 1 questions
- 4.2 Shared Meaning and Formats 1 questions
- 4.3 Internal Use Approvals 1 questions
- 4.4 Sharing Channel Selection 1 questions
- 4.5 Products Exposed to AI Agents 1 questions
-
5
5 External Sharing and Data Acquisition
Sharing agreements, recipient checks, licensing and usage rights, open data publishing, external data use limits including AI use, data ecosystem participation, review and exit
- 5.1 Data Sharing Agreements 1 questions
- 5.2 Recipient Checks 1 questions
- 5.3 Licensing and Usage Rights 1 questions
- 5.4 Open Data Publication 1 questions
- 5.5 External Data Acquisition 1 questions
- 5.6 Data Ecosystem Participation 1 questions
- 5.7 Review, Renewal and Exit 1 questions
-
6
6 Privacy-Preserving and Controlled Sharing
Method by risk, secure data environments, de-identified and synthetic releases, output checking, monitoring recipients' use
- 6.1 Sharing Method by Risk 1 questions
- 6.2 Secure Data Environments 1 questions
- 6.3 De-identified and Synthetic Releases 1 questions
- 6.4 Output Checking 1 questions
- 6.5 Monitoring High-Risk Recipients 1 questions
-
7
7 Monitoring, Value and Improvement
Usage, adoption and consumer feedback, reliability and contract breaches, realized value, sharing incidents, performance and improvement
- 7.1 Usage and Reuse 1 questions
- 7.2 Service Level Misses and Contract Breaches 1 questions
- 7.3 Value of Shared Data 1 questions
- 7.4 Sharing Incidents 1 questions
- 7.5 Performance and Improvement 1 questions
Still have questions? Get in touch
About It’s Governance
Contact us
-
Business Bay, Dubai, UAE
-
info@itsgovernance.com
-
+971 586 697 263
ITSGovernance
